The Kansas City Chiefs vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats from their 2025 meetings tell the story of a rivalry reshaped at the top of the NFL. Philadelphia defeated Kansas City twice — 40–22 in Super Bowl LIX and 20–17 in the Week 2 regular season rematch at Arrowhead Stadium. Both wins showcase elite talent on both sides of the ball, with high-impact plays, clutch playmaking, and coaching adjustments defining each contest. These franchises bring offensive pedigree and defensive resilience that analysts study closely — making every statistical breakdown essential for understanding playoff-level football at its highest level.
Quick Score Table: Kansas City Chiefs vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Eagles (Super Bowl LIX) | 17 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 40 |
| Chiefs (Super Bowl LIX) | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 22 |
| Eagles (Week 2, Sept. 14) | 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Chiefs (Week 2, Sept. 14) | 0 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
Philadelphia’s scoring progression across both games tells its own story. The Eagles scored in every quarter in both matchups — a level of consistency that reflects the coaching staff’s ability to make strategic adjustments at every interval. Kansas City’s scoring was more sporadic, concentrated in the second and fourth quarters, which limited their ability to control momentum or dictate game tempo.
Quick Match Stats Table
| Category | Eagles (SB LIX) | Chiefs (SB LIX) | Eagles (Wk 2) | Chiefs (Wk 2) |
| Total Yards | 345 | 275 | 216 | 294 |
| Passing Yards | 221 | 257 | 94 | 187 |
| Rushing Yards | 124 | 25 | 122 | 121 |
| First Downs | 21 | 12 | 17 | 16 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks | 2 | 6 | — | — |
| Red Zone | 2/3 | 1/1 | 2-2 | 1-2 |
| Time of Possession | 36:58 | 23:02 | 32:34 | 27:26 |
| Penalties | 8 for 59 yds | 7 for 75 yds | — | — |
| Attendance | — | — | 73,558 | — |
| Venue | Caesars Superdome | — | GEHA Field, Arrowhead | — |
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Analysis
In Super Bowl LIX at Caesars Superdome, Philadelphia built a 24–0 halftime lead using a score-by-quarter progression of 17–7–7–9. Kansas City’s first-half output read 0–0–7–15 — the worst first-half showing by any Super Bowl team since 1985. The Chiefs managed only 23 total yards across the first two quarters, punting on offensive possession after possession without generating any sustained drives.
The Week 2 rematch followed a tighter score-by-quarter pattern: 7–3–3–7 for Philadelphia against 0–10–0–7 for Kansas City. Philadelphia opened scoring in the first quarter, Kansas City briefly led 10–7 in the second through efficient offensive possessions, and Jake Elliott’s 58-yard field goal tied it at halftime. The home crowd at Arrowhead gave Kansas City energy, but the Eagles’ fourth-quarter execution ultimately won the game.
Both games followed the same pattern: Philadelphia controlled early momentum through the home crowd noise or hostile environments, Kansas City responded late, and Philadelphia held on.
Jalen Hurts Complete Performance Breakdown
| Stat | Super Bowl LIX | Week 2 (Sept. 14) |
| Completions/Attempts | 17/22 (77.3%) | — |
| Passing Yards | 221 | 101 |
| Passing TDs | 2 | — |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing Carries | 11 | — |
| Rushing Yards | 72 | — |
| Rushing TDs | 1 (Tush Push) | 1 (Tush Push) |
| Passer Rating | 104.5 | — |
| Total Offense | 293 | — |
Hurts’ 72 Super Bowl rushing yards set a new record for quarterbacks in a championship game, surpassing his own mark of 70 yards from Super Bowl LVII. His four total rushing touchdowns across two Super Bowl appearances tie John Elway’s record for quarterbacks in championship games.
In Week 2, he threw for just 101 yards — his season low — yet still won at Arrowhead. His high-percentage throws on critical downs kept drives alive without taking unnecessary risks. His 46-yard strike to DeVonta Smith in the Super Bowl and his two Tush Push touchdowns across both games captured his dual-threat identity: efficient, disciplined, and clutch under pressure. His ball-control game plan relied on situational awareness and clock management rather than volume passing.
Patrick Mahomes Performance Analysis
| Stat | Super Bowl LIX | Week 2 (Sept. 14) |
| Completions/Attempts | 21/32 (65.6%) | — |
| Passing Yards | 257 | 187 |
| Passing TDs | 3 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 1 |
| Rushing Yards | 25 | 66 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 6 | — |
| Yards Per Attempt | 2.36 (first half) | — |
Mahomes entered Super Bowl LIX with a 24–3 career playoff record. His arm talent and creativity were evident throughout both games, but Philadelphia’s defensive scheme neutralized his intermediate throws more effectively than any opponent had managed before. The Eagles held him to 23 total yards in the first half — the second-lowest first-half output by any quarterback in Super Bowl history on at least 15 attempts. His red zone production fell short when it mattered most, particularly in the Super Bowl, where Kansas City converted just 1-of-1 red zone trips despite generating 257 passing yards.
In Week 2, his options were limited. Rashee Rice was suspended, and Xavier Worthy was unavailable due to injury. His 13-yard scramble for a rushing touchdown and late 49-yard strike to Tyquan Thornton showed his competitive instinct, but Andrew Mukuba’s end zone interception — deflected off Travis Kelce — ended Kansas City’s final realistic comeback attempt. His Super Bowl record now stands at 3–2 across five appearances.
Quarterback Performance Comparison
Hurts and Mahomes represent contrasting quarterback styles. Hurts prioritized possession, third-down discipline, and clock management — showing leadership and composure in every critical situation. Mahomes leaned on arm talent, creativity, and intermediate throws to move the chains, generating scoring opportunities through his mobility and vision.
In both games, Hurts produced what his team needed. His decision-making under pressure kept turnovers at zero in Week 2. Mahomes produced volume passing, but couldn’t convert it into wins. The decisive factor was contention in the turnover battle: Philadelphia converted all four Kansas City turnovers into touchdowns — a 100% rate worth 28 direct points across both matchups. Mahomes’ red zone production gap and turnover differential ultimately separated the two quarterbacks in the final standings.
Saquon Barkley Rushing Stats and Milestone Performance
| Stat | Super Bowl LIX | Week 2 (Sept. 14) |
| Carries | 25 | — |
| Rushing Yards | 57 | 88 |
| Yards Per Carry | 2.3 | — |
| Receptions | 6 | — |
| Receiving Yards | 40 | — |
| Scrimmage Yards | 97 | — |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 (13-yard run) |
| Career Milestone | — | 50th career rushing TD |
Barkley closed Super Bowl LIX with 2,504 combined rushing yards across the regular season and playoffs, breaking Terrell Davis’s all-time single-season record. He won Offensive Player of the Year in his debut season with Philadelphia — a first in NFL history.
His physicality between the tackles set the tempo for both games. He broke arm tackles consistently, showed patience and vision running left side behind the offensive line, and maintained clock-control efficiency on long drives. His 13-yard rushing touchdown in Week 2 opened the scoring and was set up by Harrison Butker missing a 58-yard field goal attempt. His push block on Hurts’ Tush Push touchdowns was a decisive physical contribution that doesn’t show up in the box score but directly influenced both games.
Running Game Leaders and Rushing Stats
Kansas City’s ground game lacked a featured running back capable of generating sustained possession sequences. Mahomes himself led the team with 66 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown in Week 2, his mobility adding a backfield dimension that kept the Eagles honest. However, his per-carry average masked an inconsistency in the running back room.
Kareem Hunt was stopped at the line on a fourth-and-1 push play — a failed attempt that gave possession back to Philadelphia and led directly to Jake Elliott’s 51-yard field goal. Without a productive ground game, Kansas City’s overall drive efficiency suffered, and its time on the field was shortened significantly.
Receiving Leaders and Key Passing Targets
| Player | Team | Rec | Yards | TDs | Game |
| Xavier Worthy | Chiefs | 8 | 157 | 2 | Super Bowl LIX |
| Travis Kelce | Chiefs | — | 61 | 1 | Week 2 |
| DeVonta Smith | Eagles | — | — | — | Week 2 key role |
| Tyquan Thornton | Chiefs | — | 49 (TD) | 1 | Week 2 |
Xavier Worthy’s Super Bowl line — 8 catches, 157 yards, 2 touchdowns — was the finest individual receiving performance of either game. His 50-yard touchdown came on a deep ball that showcased his acceleration and elite speed after the catch, with a 7-yard slot route touchdown rounding out his stat line. Both scores arrived after the outcome was decided, but his numbers belong on any career highlights reel. His separation against man coverage and ability to exploit mismatches in the aerial attack made him Kansas City’s most dangerous weapon.
Travis Kelce remained Kansas City’s most reliable chain-moving target in Week 2. His 61 receiving yards came from mid-field route running against zone coverage, converting third downs with the awareness of a veteran tight end who understands how to exploit mismatches. DeVonta Smith was Philadelphia’s receiving corps leader in Week 2 — his contested catch on a 28-yard pass on third-and-10 was the decisive route-running moment of the fourth quarter, setting up Hurts’ Tush Push touchdown directly.
Cooper DeJean — Pick-Six and Defensive Heroics
Cooper DeJean turned his 22nd birthday into NFL history. Late in the second quarter of Super Bowl LIX, with Josh Sweat generating heavy pressure, Mahomes scrambled and released a hurried sideline throw — ending his streak of 297 consecutive pass attempts without an interception across 21 career playoff games. DeJean read the route from his shadow assignment covering Travis Kelce on third downs, stepped underneath, and returned the ball 38 yards for a pick-six that made it 17–0.
Vic Fangio’s coverage scheme positioned him exactly where the defensive plan predicted the throw would go. He became the first player in league history to score a pick-six on their birthday in a championship game — a record that may stand indefinitely.
Josh Sweat and the Zero-Blitz Dominance
Philadelphia generated 6 sacks and a 38.1% pressure rate in Super Bowl LIX without sending a single blitz across 42 Kansas City passing attempts. Josh Sweat led with 2.5 sacks. Milton Williams added 2 more.
This four-man defensive front created numerical advantages at the line of scrimmage through individual matchups won so thoroughly that coverage defenders never needed to leave their zones. Kansas City’s offensive linemen could not counter the pressure, and Mahomes had no quick throws available because every route was covered. Blitz packages were never needed — the pass rush won without them.
Only four teams in the Next Gen Stats era have played a full game without blitzing. Only the Eagles produced 6 sacks in the same game against Kansas City’s offensive line.
Zack Baun and Defensive Standouts
All-Pro linebacker Zack Baun’s second-quarter interception in the Super Bowl sealed the half. He read a crossing route, stepped in front of the receiver at the 15-yard line, and set up an A.J. Brown 12-yard touchdown that pushed the score to 24–0. Baun finished with 7 total tackles alongside his interception, contributing to both the passing and running game.
Philadelphia’s linebackers and secondary maintained gap integrity and pursuit angles throughout both games, preventing open-field tackling breakdowns. Their sustained drives on defense — forcing punts and limiting scoring — gave the offense consistent field position advantages and a time-of-possession edge that compounded over four quarters.
Andrew Mukuba — The Play That Decided the Regular Season Rematch
With Kansas City trailing 13–10 and driving in the fourth quarter, Mahomes threw toward the end zone. The ball grazed Kelce’s outstretched hands and deflected into Mukuba’s arms. The safety secured the interception and returned it 41 yards, giving Philadelphia excellent field position.
Mukuba’s coverage responsibilities on that play reflected Fangio’s scheme perfectly — his run support and zone awareness kept him in the right position at the decisive moment. DeVonta Smith’s 28-yard catch on third-and-10 advanced the Eagles to the four-yard line. Hurts scored on the Tush Push two plays later — 20–10, effectively game over. Mukuba also contributed a sack alongside Za’Darius Smith in the third quarter, a complete two-way performance from the safety position.
Jake Elliott Special Teams Performance
| Kick | Distance | Quarter | Result |
| Field Goal | 58 yards | Q2 | Made — tied 10-10 at halftime |
| Field Goal | 51 yards | Q3 | Made — Eagles lead 13-10 |
Both field goals came at critical moments. Elliott’s 58-yarder answered Mahomes’ scrambling go-ahead touchdown, eliminating any scoring probability advantage Kansas City had briefly gained. His 51-yarder came directly after Kareem Hunt was stuffed on fourth-and-1, turning hidden yardage and field position into three immediate points.
Philadelphia’s punt coverage and kickoff placements generated consistent return yard advantages over Kansas City throughout the game, pinning the Chiefs deep and reducing their offensive flexibility. The special teams’ contributions — often overlooked — provided scoring probability boosts and field position edges that influenced nearly every possession sequence.
Defensive Standouts and Impact Plays
Philadelphia’s defense executed a disciplined scheme across both games that neutralized Kansas City’s most dangerous weapons. Their four-man rush generated hurried throws and disrupted backfield timing without requiring blitz packages. The individual matchups in the trenches consistently favored Philadelphia’s defensive front.
Kansas City’s defense also produced notable plays — tight coverage on intermediate routes, strong open-field tackling, and gap integrity in run support. But Philadelphia’s pursuit angles and coverage schemes prevented sustained drives, forcing the Chiefs into unfavorable third-down situations. The time-of-possession advantage Philadelphia maintained gave its defense rest and created the conditions for key stops in critical moments.
Turnovers, Penalties, and Game-Changing Moments
Philadelphia committed zero turnovers in Week 2 and one in the Super Bowl. Kansas City suffered three turnovers in the Super Bowl and one in Week 2. The turnover disparity was decisive — Philadelphia converted all four forced turnovers into touchdowns, generating 28 direct points from defensive opportunism alone.
Stalled drives caused by penalties compounded Kansas City’s drive efficiency problems. Both teams incurred enough infractions to disrupt third-down conversions, but Philadelphia’s execution on penalty-free downs was consistently more productive. In a 20–17 game and a 40–22 blowout, every stalled drive carried amplified significance for the losing team.
Red Zone Efficiency and Third-Down Conversions
Philadelphia converted 2-of-2 red zone opportunities in Week 2 and 2-of-3 in the Super Bowl. Kansas City converted 1-of-2 in Week 2 — fewer scoring range trips and lower conversion rates directly limited their scoring momentum in both matchups.
Philadelphia’s red zone play-calling mixed inside runs, misdirection plays, and the Tush Push to exploit high-leverage situations. Execution errors by Kansas City in tight spaces — particularly on third-down conversions — prevented them from turning yardage into points. Ball control in the red zone proved to be where Philadelphia’s defense and offensive discipline separated the two teams most clearly.
Time of Possession and Game Control Metrics
| Game | Eagles TOP | Chiefs TOP |
| Super Bowl LIX | 36:58 | 23:02 |
| Week 2 (Sept. 14) | 32:34 | 27:26 |
Philadelphia’s possession advantage functioned as both offensive philosophy and defensive strategy. Fewer Kansas City possessions meant fewer Mahomes opportunities and reduced scoring chances for the Chiefs. A rested defense performed better in critical moments. Long Eagles drives built through rushing and high-percentage passing forced Kansas City into a faster game tempo — compressed offensive series under coverage schemes that created turnovers.
The numbers reflect a consistent approach across both games: control the ball, limit possessions, and use clock management as a strategic weapon that exhausts the opponent’s defense while protecting your own.
Coaching Strategy and Tactical Adjustments
Nick Sirianni’s game plan centered on ball control, a balanced rush-pass mix, and zero tolerance for turnovers. He used rotating personnel and varied run schemes to counter Kansas City’s defensive formations at halftime. His spacing concepts and tempo management kept the Chiefs’ defense unable to settle into a consistent alignment.
Andy Reid emphasized intermediate passing routes and Mahomes’ mobility to exploit spacing. Philadelphia’s front seven disrupted timing throughout, forcing mid-drive recalibrations. Reid’s halftime adjustments — quick passes to running backs, varied route combinations — partially worked but couldn’t overcome Philadelphia’s structural tactical adaptability in ball protection and field position management.
Key Player Matchups That Defined the Game
The quarterback duel between Hurts and Mahomes was the headline, but the chess match in the trenches was equally decisive. Philadelphia’s defensive front beat Kansas City’s offensive linemen at the perimeter and interior simultaneously — without blitz help. Backfield timing was disrupted so consistently that Mahomes’ designed scrambles became reactive rather than proactive.
On offense, Hurts’ dual-threat ability forced Kansas City to defend all levels of the field. His composure in third-down situations — converting through the air and on the ground — kept drives alive and clocks ticking. The tactical adjustments both coaching staffs made in real time shaped the explosive play differential and ultimately determined which team generated more scoring opportunities at the decisive moments.
Statistical Comparison — Eagles vs Chiefs Team Metrics
Kansas City outgained Philadelphia in total yardage in Week 2 (294 to 216). Philadelphia won by three points. Across both games, the Chiefs generated significant raw yardage, but scoring opportunities didn’t convert at the same rate.
The series score without Philadelphia’s turnover conversions reads Eagles 52, Chiefs 39. The Eagles still win both games. But defensive opportunism and sustained drives in high-leverage situations explain the actual margin. Philadelphia’s superiority in third-down efficiency, ball control, and situational execution — not raw production — won both contests. This is the core NFL principle these two matchups reinforce: efficiency over volume, every time.
Historical Context and What These Games Mean Going Forward
Philadelphia’s victories gave them three consecutive wins over Mahomes — something no opponent had managed across his previous seven NFL seasons. Kansas City’s three-peat bid — which would have made them the first franchise in NFL history to win three straight Super Bowls — ended 40–22 in New Orleans. The Green Bay Packers’ back-to-back championships from 1965–67 remain the last time any professional football team won three consecutive titles.
Mahomes’ Super Bowl record stands at 3–2. His record against Philadelphia is 0–2. Kansas City’s red zone struggles, ball protection issues, and inability to counter Philadelphia’s Mahomes dual-threat containment scheme highlight what disciplined teams can do against even the most talented quarterbacks. Kansas City opened 2025 at 0–2 — the first time since Andy Reid’s 2014 season, their last missed playoffs year.
For Philadelphia, these wins confirm that their defensive identity and schematic statement of zero-blitz dominance travels to any venue. They won at Arrowhead with 101 passing yards through tempo management and championship organization execution. Complementary football — zero-blitz defense, special teams clutch plays, and a quarterback who delivers what each game requires — defines this Eagles team going forward.
Conclusion
The Philadelphia Eagles dominated the Kansas City Chiefs across both 2025 meetings through balance, discipline, and situational execution. Whether winning by 18 in the Super Bowl or by 3 at Arrowhead, Philadelphia imposed the same identity: control possession, protect the ball, and convert when it matters. Kansas City generated raw yardage in both games — their statistical dominance between the 20s was real. The Eagles generated wins through tactical adaptability, composure under pressure, and defensive excellence. At the highest level of NFL competition across an entire season, the difference between those two things is what every stat in this breakdown makes clear.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Eagles vs Chiefs game discussed here?
The Philadelphia Eagles won both 2025 matchups — 40–22 in Super Bowl LIX on February 9, 2025, at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, and 20–17 in the Week 2 regular season game at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium on September 14, 2025.
How did Saquon Barkley perform?
Barkley rushed for 88 yards and scored a touchdown in the Week 2 rematch, reaching his 50th career rushing touchdown. In Super Bowl LIX, he carried 25 times for 57 yards while breaking Terrell Davis’s all-time single-season rushing record with 2,504 combined yards.
What did Patrick Mahomes do in this game?
In Week 2, Mahomes threw for 187 yards with 1 touchdown, 1 interception, and added 66 rushing yards and a rushing score. In the Super Bowl, he threw for 257 yards with 3 touchdowns and 2 interceptions while absorbing 6 sacks across five Super Bowl appearances.
Which team controlled the time of possession?
The Eagles controlled the ball in both games — 36:58 to 23:02 in the Super Bowl and 32:34 to 27:26 in the Week 2 rematch at Arrowhead.
How did red zone performance affect the result?
Philadelphia converted 2-of-2 red zone opportunities in Week 2 and 2-of-3 in the Super Bowl. Kansas City converted 1-of-2 in Week 2 — fewer trips and lower conversion efficiency directly limited their scoring in both matchups.
Was special teams influential?
Yes. Jake Elliott hit a 58-yard field goal to tie the Week 2 game at halftime and a 51-yard field goal to take the lead in the third quarter. Philadelphia’s coverage units consistently generated field position and return yard advantages, limiting Kansas City’s offensive starting positions throughout both games.
